Our readings for the week explored some different and
similar interpretations of EFL/ESL texts and their images and messages. It is interesting to read about how impactful
images can be, or as Giaschi writes, “a picture is worth a thousand
words.” When you really think about it,
who should be represented in EFL/ESL texts? Should it be British culture or
“American culture?” Hinkel writes about
the complexity of EFL/ESL texts and materials and how they are rarely
culturally neutral. It is the teacher’s
responsibility to apply mediums of instruction by using methods that reflect
those mediums/ materials. For example,
it is important for teachers to discuss with their students the meanings of the
images and what they represent. In
Mendes’s study, she explores how images in EFL/ESL texts, which represent
English cultures shape students’ and teachers’ impressions of the target
foreign-language culture. I think it was
interesting that she recognized that students had the ability and willingness, when
asked, to share their ideas of race and power in the images in their
textbooks. Her findings contrast
Giaschi’s belief that, “students of ESL may find it difficult or impossible to
challenge the hidden meaning in the materials provided to them. I think I would have to agree with Mendes in
that students, given the opportunity, are able to express their ideas about the
images and what they mean to them.
Mendes illustrates this in her study.
First of all, I thought it was very important that she first recognized
her position of power as an experienced EFL instructor who is a White woman
from Canada and considered it when doing her study. She talks about how this may influence her
participant’s responses. However, then
she proceeds to tell us that several of the participants are former students of
hers so they would feel comfortable sharing their perspectives. During her interviews, she found that most of
her participants were able to express critical viewpoints about the images
presented in their textbooks. The
participants noticed that whites were represented as an ‘elite’ race in the
images, and blacks were represented as poor or powerless. I also thought it was interesting that the
white students noticed the underrepresentation of minority people in the
textbooks more so than the two participants who were black and mulatto. Mendes suggests that ESL textbook images do
not explore migration, immigration, colonization or the intermixing of race and
identity. What kind of a message does
this send to ESL/EFL students around the world?
According to one of the participants, it reinforces stereotypes such as,
“White American families eating hamburgers.”
Giaschi also points out stereotypes of gender that are represented in
ESL/EFL textbook images. It is interesting
to think about how just the positioning of men and women in an image can send
such a strong message to the reader/viewer.
Overall, I liked that each reading explored different issues related to
EFL/ESL texts and their images.
No comments:
Post a Comment